Call Now For a Free Consultation 208-552-0467

Idaho Civil Rule 32: Using Depositions in Court ProceedingsTypically, attorneys will use a deposition in a trial. Whereas Idaho Civil Rules 30 and 31 described how to take a deposition, Rule 32 is about how to use those depositions in court. The first part of Rule 32 states that, in general, all parts of a deposition can be used in a trial if the party was present or had reasonable notice of the deposition and it is used in a way consistent with the Idaho Rules of Evidence. This would allow a deposition to be used to contradict or impeach the testimony of a witness. A deposition can also be used in place of a witness that is unavailable as well.

Importantly, Rule 32 also allows a deposition from an earlier case to be used in a later case, as long as the deposition had been taken properly, is between the same parties, and involves the same subject matter.

Then Rule 32 describes when various objections have been waived. For instance, an objection to the officer’s qualifications is waived if the objection is not raised before the deposition begins or as soon as a basis for disqualification becomes known.

Idaho Civil Rule 32: Using Depositions in Court Proceedings

  1. Using depositions.
    • In general.At a hearing, trial or upon an interlocutory proceeding, all or part of a deposition may be used against a party on these conditions:
      1. the party was present or represented at the taking of the deposition or had reasonable notice of it;
      2. it is used to the extent it would be admissible under the Idaho Rules of Evidence if the deponent were present and testifying; and
      3. the use is allowed by Rule 32(a)(2) through (8).
    • Impeachment and other uses. Any party may use a deposition to contradict or impeach the testimony given by the deponent as a witness, or for any other purpose allowed by the Idaho Rules of Evidence.
    • Deposition of party, agent, or designee. An adverse party may use for any purpose the deposition of a party or anyone who, when deposed, was the party’s officer, director, managing agent, or designee under Rule 30(b)(6) or 31(a)(4).
    • Unavailable witness.A party may use for any purpose the deposition of a witness, whether or not a party, if the court finds:
      1. that the witness is dead;
      2. that the witness is more than 100 miles from the place of hearing or trial or is outside the state of Idaho, unless it appears that the witness’s absence was procured by the party offering the deposition;
      3. that the witness cannot attend or testify because of age, illness, infirmity, or imprisonment;
      4. that the party offering the deposition could not procure the witness’s attendance by subpoena; or
      5. on motion and notice, that exceptional circumstances make it desirable, in the interest of justice and with due regard to the importance of live testimony in open court, to permit the deposition to be used.
    • Limitations on use.
      1. Deposition taken on short notice. A deposition must not be used against a party who, having received less than 14 days’ notice of the deposition, promptly moved for a protective order under Rule 26(c)(1)(B) requesting that it not be taken or be taken at a different time or place, and this motion was still pending when the deposition was taken.
      2. Unavailable deponent; Party could not obtain an attorney. A deposition taken without leave of court under the unavailability provision of Rule 30(a)(2)(B)(ii) must not be used against a party who shows that, when served with the notice, it could not, despite diligent efforts, obtain an attorney to represent it at the deposition.
    • Using part of a deposition. If a party offers in evidence only part of a deposition, an adverse party may require the offeror to introduce other parts that in fairness should be considered with the part introduced, and any party may itself introduce any other parts.
    • Substituting a party.Substituting a party under Rule 25 does not affect the right to use a deposition previously taken.
    • Deposition taken in an earlier action.A deposition lawfully taken in any federal- or state-court action may be used in a later action involving the same subject matter between the same parties, or their representatives or successors in interest, to the same extent as if taken in the later action. A deposition previously taken may also be used as allowed by the Idaho Rules of Evidence.
  2. Objections to admissibility. Subject to Rule 32(d)(3), an objection may be made at a hearing or trial to the admission of any deposition testimony that would be inadmissible if the witness were present and testifying.
  3. Waiver of objections.
    • To the notice.An objection to an error or irregularity in a deposition notice is waived unless promptly served in writing on the party giving the notice.
    • To the officer’s qualification.An objection based on disqualification of the officer before whom a deposition is to be taken is waived if not made:
      1. before the deposition begins; or
      2. promptly after the basis for disqualification becomes known or, with reasonable diligence, could have been known.
    • To the taking of the deposition.
      1. Objection to competence, relevance, or materiality. An objection to a deponent’s competence, or to the competence, relevance, or materiality of testimony, is not waived by a failure to make the objection before or during the deposition, unless the ground for it might have been corrected at that time.
      2. Objection to an error or irregularity. An objection to an error or irregularity at an oral examination is waived if:
        • it relates to the manner of taking the deposition, the form of a question or answer, the oath or affirmation, a party’s conduct, or other matters that might have been corrected at that time; and
        • it is not timely made during the deposition.
      3. Objection to a written question. An objection to the form of a written question under Rule 31 is waived if not served in writing on the party submitting the question within the time for serving responsive questions or, if the question is a recross-question, within 7 days after being served with it.
    • To completing and returning the deposition. An objection to how the officer transcribed the testimony, or prepared, signed, certified, sealed, endorsed, sent, or otherwise dealt with the deposition, is waived unless a motion to suppress is made promptly after the error or irregularity becomes known or, with reasonable diligence, could have been known.

 

Idaho Falls Law Office

Our Idaho Falls, Idaho law office services clients in and surrounding Idaho Falls, including for injuries and accidents in Ammon, Rigby, injuries and accidents in Shelley and Blackfoot, and injuries and accidents in Rexburg. If you are looking for an attorney in the Idaho Falls area, visit or call our Idaho Falls office now. 3423 Merlin Dr., Idaho Falls, ID 83404 Phone:(208) 552-0467

 

Gordon Law Idaho Falls

Brent Gordon Law

Pocatello Law Office

Our Pocatello, Idaho law office services clients in and surrounding Pocatello, including for injuries and accidents in Chubbuck. If you are looking for an attorney in the Pocatello area, call our Pocatello office now. Our experienced personal injury attorneys will work hard to get you the compensation you deserve. Call (208) 232-7274 for a free consultation. 154 North Main St. Pocatello, ID 83204 Phone:(208) 232-7274

Gordon Law Pocatello

Brent Gordon Law